The inauguration of Donald Trump was a day marked by significant events, including traditional ceremonies and the presence of seasoned political figures. However, one of the most crucial actions was his signing of 25 executive orders right on his first day in office. Among these, the revocation of Executive Order 11246, known as the Equal Employment Opportunity, grabbed the spotlight.
Originally signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson back in 1965, this order has been a cornerstone in preventing discrimination within federal employment, ensuring that everyone has a fair shot at opportunities.
This policy expressly prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. It also mandates federal contractors to adopt affirmative action plans that focus on diversity.
What Does Revoking the Equal Employment Opportunity Order Mean?
Although withdrawing this order doesn’t make discrimination lawful, it undeniably weakens the defenses we have built against racism and other biases.
Before taking office, Trump openly discussed his intent to dismantle the Equal Employment Order. He argued that doing away with DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) programs was crucial because he described them as “dangerous, demeaning, and immoral.” Many Republicans, alongside Trump, view DEI policies as unfairly disadvantageous to majority groups.
However, it’s essential to clarify: the revocation of this executive order does not legalize discrimination. The Civil Rights Act continues to be a powerful legal statute. Even if Trump wants us to believe he can make it disappear, he cannot. Executive orders don’t have the power to repeal laws.
— Tim Wise (@timjacobwise) January 23, 2025
Monumental as his revocation may seem, Trump lacks the ability to annul the Equal Employment Opportunity Act. Enacted by Congress and endorsed by former President Richard Nixon in 1972, it remains firmly in place.
Reactions and Criticism
Unsurprisingly, Trump’s decision ignited a wave of backlash.
“Good for straight white males. Bad for everyone else,” was one unimpressed comment making rounds on social media.
Basil Smikle Jr, a political strategist and advisor, offered his insights: “There’s an apparent effort to diminish, if not completely dismantle, the political and economic power of women and people of color.”
“It essentially opens the door wider for more cronyism,” Smikle observed.
These discussions and questions reflect the broader societal concerns on the effects of removing such protective measures. The implications of this shift in policy are far-reaching, influencing workplace cultures and the possibilities for advancing equality and fairness across various sectors.
It’s crucial to keep these conversations alive as they shape how we continue to handle diversity and inclusion within our communities and workplaces.
